Comparison of the effect of spreader and T-Splay graft in internal nasal valve management

dc.contributor.authorKapı, Emin
dc.contributor.authorKopal, Can
dc.contributor.authorSeyhan, Tamer
dc.contributor.authorÇelik, Yusuf
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-08T11:22:18Z
dc.date.available2022-04-08T11:22:18Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.description.abstractBackground The midvalve area is one of the most important anatomical points in rhinoplasty procedures. An additional intervention may be required to ensure there is no narrowing in this region. For this reason, several different techniques are used. Spreader graft technique is the most common of all these methods. T-splay graft technique is an alternative method that can effectively widen the angle of the midvalve. The present study compares the anatomical and functional outcomes of these two methods. Methods The study included 60 cases who presented to our clinic for rhinoplasty. The cases were evaluated demographically, anatomically, and functionally, and the acquired data were recorded. All cases were preoperatively administered the Visual Analogue Scale, the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scale, and the modified Glatzel mirror test. By randomly selecting the cases, midvalve restoration was performed with a spreader graft in 30 cases and a T-splay graft in 30 cases. Results A comparison of the Visual Analogue Scale, the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scale, and the modified Glatzel mirror test scores revealed that the scores of both groups at postoperative months 3 and 6 were significantly different from the preoperative measurement values. Conclusions Although spreader graft technique is a very effective method in midvalve management, we believe that T-splay graft technique may also produce effective outcomes. In addition, the midvalve functions could be better simulated anatomically and functionally with T-splay graft technique. Therefore, we believe that T-splay graft technique is an alternative method that can be safely used in selected cases.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00266-022-02822-w
dc.identifier.endpage-en_US
dc.identifier.issn0364-216X
dc.identifier.issn1432-5241
dc.identifier.issue-en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35201376
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage-en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps:/dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02822-w
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12451/9271
dc.identifier.volume-en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000760704000003
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofAesthetic Plastic Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectRhinoplasty
dc.subjectInternal Nasal Valve
dc.subjectMidvalve
dc.subjectSpreader Graft
dc.subjectT-splay Graft
dc.titleComparison of the effect of spreader and T-Splay graft in internal nasal valve management
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
kapi-emin-2022.pdf
Boyut:
7.83 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: