Beç tavuğu (numida meleagridis) ve hindi (meleagridis gallapova) neurocranium'u üzerinde karşılaştırmalı makro-anatomik ve morfometrik incelemeler
Yükleniyor...
Tarih
2016
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Fırat Üniversitesi
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Bu araştırmada Phasinidae familyasının Numidinae alt familyasında yer alan beç tavuğu ve hindinin neurocranium kemiklerinin karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenerek önemli farklılıkların ortaya konulması amaçlandı. Cinsiyet gözetmeksizin 5 adet beç tavuğu ve 5 adet hindi kullanıldı. Neurocranium’un; os occipitale, os sphenoidale, ossa parietalia, ossa frontalia ve ossa temporalia’dan oluştuğu gözlendi. Beç tavuğunda fontanella düz olarak, hindide kabarık olarak yer aldığı tespit edildi. Sadece neurocranium kemiklerinin oluşturduğu kafatası ağırlığı hindilerde daha fazla olduğu ve istatiksel açıdan P<0.01 düzeylerinde önemli olduğu gözlendi. Os parietale’nin beç tavuğunda caudal’de, hindilerde dorsal’de olduğu gözlendi. Beç tavuğunda ossa frontalia, dar ve ortasında miğfer şeklinde ibiğin oluşumuna katılan caudodorsal yönde boynuz çıkıntısı yer almaktayken, hindilerde geniş ve çıkıntı bulunmamaktaydı. Sonuç olarak; aynı familyada yer alan beç tavuğu ve hindi neurocranium’u oluşturan kemikler arasında önemli farklılıklar tespit edildi.
In this study, neurocranial bones of guinea fowl and turkey in Numidinae subfamilies of Phasinida family was investigated comparatively to reveal significant differences. Five guinea fowls and 5 turkeys were used regardless of their gender. The neurocranium consisted of the occipital, sphenoid, parietal, frontal and temporal bones. The fontanella was located smooth in the guinea fowl, while convex in the turkey. Weight of neurocranium bones only in turkey was heavier than that of guinea fowl and significant (P<0.01). It was observed that the parietal bone of the guinea fowl was located to be flat caudal, turkey was located to be flat dorsal. Frontal bones were narrow and in the middle of it caudo-dorsal horn protrusion located the helmet shape in participating in the formation of comb in the guinea fowl, while broad and there was no protrusion in the turkey. As a result, located in the same family of guinea fowl and turkey, it was determined that there were significant differences between the bones forming the neurocranium.
In this study, neurocranial bones of guinea fowl and turkey in Numidinae subfamilies of Phasinida family was investigated comparatively to reveal significant differences. Five guinea fowls and 5 turkeys were used regardless of their gender. The neurocranium consisted of the occipital, sphenoid, parietal, frontal and temporal bones. The fontanella was located smooth in the guinea fowl, while convex in the turkey. Weight of neurocranium bones only in turkey was heavier than that of guinea fowl and significant (P<0.01). It was observed that the parietal bone of the guinea fowl was located to be flat caudal, turkey was located to be flat dorsal. Frontal bones were narrow and in the middle of it caudo-dorsal horn protrusion located the helmet shape in participating in the formation of comb in the guinea fowl, while broad and there was no protrusion in the turkey. As a result, located in the same family of guinea fowl and turkey, it was determined that there were significant differences between the bones forming the neurocranium.
Açıklama
İlgün, Ramazan (Aksaray, Yazar)
Anahtar Kelimeler
Anatomi, Beç Tavuğu, Hindi, Neurocranium, Anatomy, Guinea Fowl, Turkey
Kaynak
Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Veteriner Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
30
Sayı
1
