Impact of limb occlusion pressure assessment position on performance, cardiovascular, and perceptual responses in blood flow restricted low-load resistance exercise: A randomized crossover trial

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-5640-7833
dc.authorid0000-0003-0430-5015
dc.authorid0000-0003-4117-0295
dc.authorid0000-0001-6291-5351
dc.authorid0000-0002-7458-7225
dc.authorid0000-0003-3374-1000
dc.authorid0009-0004-4327-0796
dc.authorid0000-0003-4525-1308
dc.authorid0000-0002-3215-1319
dc.contributor.authorKamış, Okan
dc.contributor.authorRolnick, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorde Queiros, Victor S
dc.contributor.authorAkçay, Neslihan
dc.contributor.authorKeskin, Kadir
dc.contributor.authorYıldız, Kerem Can
dc.contributor.authorWerner, Tim
dc.contributor.authorHughes, Luke
dc.contributor.authorSofuoğlu, Cem
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-19T11:57:46Z
dc.date.available2024-11-19T11:57:46Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentRektörlük
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated the effect of limb occlusion pressure (LOP) position on exercise performance, cardiovascular responses, and perceptual experiences during seated bilateral leg extensions with and without blood flow restriction (BFR). Thirty resistance-trained males (age: 22?±?2?years; weight: 74.4?±?13.6?kg; height: 177.4?±?6.4?cm; BMI: 23.5?±?3.3?kg/m2) participated. Each performed exercise to failure (4 sets, 30% 1RM, 1?min rest) in three conditions: Supine LOP-BFR, Seated LOP-BFR, and no-BFR. BFR was applied at 60% LOP. Significant interaction effects were found for RPE (p?=?0.021, d?=?0.76), RPD (p?<?0.01, d?=?1.72), and DOMS (p?<?0.01, d?=?2.28). Statistically significant fewer repetitions were completed in Supine LOP-BFR vs. no-BFR (p?<?0.01, d?=?0.5), Seated LOP-BFR vs. no-BFR (p?<?0.01, d?=?1.0), and Seated LOP-BFR vs. Supine LOP-BFR (p?<?0.01, d?=?0.6). RPE was higher in Seated LOP-BFR vs. no-BFR (p?<?0.01, d?=?0.52). RPD was higher in Supine LOP-BFR vs. no-BFR (p?<?0.01, d?=?0.62) and Seated LOP-BFR vs. no-BFR (p?<?0.01, d?=?1.25). DOMS was higher in Supine LOP-BFR vs. no-BFR (p?<?0.01, d?=?0.77) and Seated LOP-BFR vs. no-BFR (p?<?0.01, d?=?3.52). Seated LOP-BFR increased perceptual demands and reduced repetitions compared to Supine LOP-BFR. Both LOP-BFR conditions reduced repetitions compared to no-BFR without affecting cardiovascular measures.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02640414.2024.2422205.
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps:/dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2024.2422205.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12451/12655
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Sports Sciences
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.subjectBlood Flow Restriction
dc.subjectResistance Training
dc.subjectArterialocclusion Pressure
dc.subjectOcclusiontraining
dc.titleImpact of limb occlusion pressure assessment position on performance, cardiovascular, and perceptual responses in blood flow restricted low-load resistance exercise: A randomized crossover trial
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
kamis-okan-2024.pdf
Boyut:
3.95 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu