Body position and cuff size influence lower limb arterial occlusion pressure and its predictors: implications for standardizing the pressure applied in training with blood flow restriction

dc.contributor.authorde Queiros, Victor S.
dc.contributor.authorRolnick, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorKamış, Okan
dc.contributor.authorFormiga, Magno F.
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Roberto F. C.
dc.contributor.authorAlves, Júlio César Medeiros
dc.contributor.authorVieira, João Guilherme
dc.contributor.authorVianna, Jeferson Macedo
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-03T11:47:20Z
dc.date.available2024-09-03T11:47:20Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentRektörlük
dc.description.abstractArterial occlusion pressure (AOP) is a relevant measurement for individualized prescription of exercise with blood flow restriction (BFRE). Therefore, it is important to consider factors that may influence this measure. Purpose: This study aimed to compare lower limb AOP (LL-AOP) measured with 11 cm (medium) and 18 cm (large) cuffs, in different body positions, and explore the predictors for each of the LL-AOP measurements performed. This information may be useful for future studies that seek to develop approaches to improve the standardization of pressure adopted in BFRE, including proposals for equations to estimate LL-AOP. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. Fifty-one healthy volunteers (males, n = 25, females, n = 26; Age: 18–40 years old) underwent measurement of thigh circumference (TC), brachial blood pressure, followed by assessments of LL-AOP with medium and large cuffs in positions supine, sitting and standing positions. Results: The large cuff required less external pressure (mmHg) to elicit arterial occlusion in all three-body positions when compared to the medium cuff (p < 0.001). The LL-AOP was significantly lower in the supine position, regardless of the cuff used (p < 0.001). Systolic blood pressure was the main predictor of LL-AOP in the large cuff, while TC was the main predictor of LL-AOP with the medium cuff. Body position influenced strength of the LL-AOP predictors. Conclusion: Our results indicate that LL-AOP and its predictors are substantially influenced by body position and cuff width.
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fphys.2024.1446963
dc.identifier.isbn1664042X
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps:/dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1446963
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12451/12399
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFrontiers Media SA
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Physiology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectBlood Flow Restriction Therapy
dc.subjectBlood Pressure
dc.subjectCuff Width
dc.subjectLimb Arterial Occlusion
dc.subjectThigh Circumference
dc.titleBody position and cuff size influence lower limb arterial occlusion pressure and its predictors: implications for standardizing the pressure applied in training with blood flow restriction
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
de queiros-victor s.-2024.pdf
Boyut:
957.6 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: