Prevalence of post-procedural pain and associated factors experienced after transradial coronary angiography

dc.contributor.authorGül, Murat
dc.contributor.authorAcar, Burak
dc.contributor.authorKarabulut, Özlem
dc.contributor.authorKaranfil, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorÜnal, Sefa
dc.contributor.authorYayla, Çağrı
dc.contributor.authorErtem, Ahmet Göktuğ
dc.contributor.authorErbay, İlke
dc.contributor.authorTok, Derya
dc.contributor.authorDemirkan, Burcu
dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, Ayça
dc.contributor.authorKısacık, Halil Lütfi
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-09T05:45:34Z
dc.date.available2021-11-09T05:45:34Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Coronary angiography is a principle diagnostic and therapeutic procedure in modern cardiology practice. The transradial access for cardiac catheterization has overtaken the transfemoral approach because of many advantages. However, some patients suffer radial pain after the procedure. Unfortunately, this complication has been poorly evaluated in previous studies. The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of radial pain after transradial coronary angiography and investigate factors that influence post-procedural pain. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study in which a total of 100 consecutive patients who underwent elective transradial coronary angiography ± percutaneous coronary intervention between January 2015–2016 were evaluated. The patients were asked about presence of disturbing pain in the forearm especially wrist region after the procedure. Verbal rating scale was used to evaluate pain assessment. The patients were divided as early pain group (two hours after the procedure) and prolonged pain group (one month after the procedure) and analysis was performed. Results: A total of 55 patients suffered from pain in the early phase (after two hours), and 26 of patients had prolonged pain at one month after the radial intervention. Independent pain predictors in the early pain group were male operator (p = 0.004, OR = 3.386, 95% CI: 1.484–7.725) and experience of operator (OR = 4.147, 95% CI: 1.637–10.506, p = 0.003). On the other hand, the younger age of patients (OR = 0.955, 95% CI: 0.915–0.966, p = 0.032) and experience of operator (OR = 3.947, 95% CI: 1.547–10.047, p = 0.004) were the independent predictors of prolonged radial pain. Conclusion: Pain after radial coronary angiography is not uncommon. Experience, operator gender, and age of the patients were independent predictors of pain after transradial coronary angiography.
dc.identifier.doi10.33678/COR.2020.099
dc.identifier.endpage317en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage312en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps:/dx.doi.org/10.33678/COR.2020.099
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12451/8607
dc.identifier.volume63en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCzech Society of Cardiology Z.S
dc.relation.ispartofCor et Vasa
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectCoronary Angiography
dc.subjectPain
dc.subjectRadial
dc.titlePrevalence of post-procedural pain and associated factors experienced after transradial coronary angiography
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
gul-murat-2021.pdf
Boyut:
89.37 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: