Yatay dikey bireycilik/toplulukçuluk sosyal sermaye arasındaki ilişkiler
Loading...
Date
2018
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
ADAMOR Toplum Araştırmaları Merkezi
Access Rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Abstract
Sosyal sermaye, güvene dayalı insan ilişkilerinin ürünü olan ve maddi olmayan bir tür sermayedir. Sosyal sermaye, üç önemli öğeden oluşmaktadır bunlar: güven, ortak değerler ve iletişim ağları ile birbirine bağlanmanın oluşturduğu grup aidiyetidir. Başka insanları tanımak ve o insanlar ile sürekli iletişim halinde olmak bir yerde sosyal sermayenin oluşması sağlamaz. Tanıdığımız insanlara güvenmek kendinizi bu insanlardan oluşan bir gruba ait hissetdip ve iletişim kurduğunuz kişilerle bazı ortak değerleri taşıdığınıza inanmamız gereklidir. Sosyal ve kültürlerarası psikolojide bireycilik ve toplulukçuluk üzerine çok sayıda araştırma yapılmış ve kavramlaştırma öne sürülmüştür. Triandis, yatay ve dikey bireycilik /toplulukçuluk kavramsalaştırması oluşturmuştur. Dikey toplulukçulukta benlik, grup üyelerinin eşit olarak algılanmadığı bir topluluğun parçasıdır. Yatay toplulukçulukta ise benlik, grup üyelerinin eşit olarak algılandığı bir topluluğun parçasıdır. Sosyal sermaye içinde bulunulan kültürden etkilenmektedir. bu araştırmada yatay ve dikey bireycilik /toplulukçuluk benlik kurgularının sosyal sermayeyi yordayıp yordamadığını belirlemek için regresyon modeli geliştirilip test edilmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına göre Benlik kurgularının sosyal sermaye boyutlarını yordadığı görülmüştür.
Social capital is a result of human relations that depends on trust and it is a non-material capital. Three important components of social capital that created by social networks are trust, common values and the emotional of belongings. To know people and to be in touch with them are not enough for the emergence of a social capital. Belonging, knowing and trust to other people and to believe that you are sharing common values with these people are necessary for the social capital. Many of researches on individualism and collectivism have been conducted in social and cross-cultural psychology and conceptualization has been put forward. Triandis makes the distinction between horizontal and vertical individualism/collectivism. The self in vertical collectivism is perceived as part of a society based on inequality. In the horizontal collectivism, the self is part of a community where group members are perceived as equal. Vertical individualism, acceptance of autonomous individual and inequality; horizontal individualism consists of an autonomous individual and an emphasis on equality. Some psychologists suggest that social capital related to individualism and collectivism. In light of the literature the aim of this study is to examine whether vertical and horizontal individualism/collectivism predict social capital. Regression analysis was used to determine whether vertical and horizontal individualism/collectivism predict social capital. Overall, the results of this study indicated that Vertical individualism/Collectivism and Horizontal individualism/Collectivism predicted social capital.
Social capital is a result of human relations that depends on trust and it is a non-material capital. Three important components of social capital that created by social networks are trust, common values and the emotional of belongings. To know people and to be in touch with them are not enough for the emergence of a social capital. Belonging, knowing and trust to other people and to believe that you are sharing common values with these people are necessary for the social capital. Many of researches on individualism and collectivism have been conducted in social and cross-cultural psychology and conceptualization has been put forward. Triandis makes the distinction between horizontal and vertical individualism/collectivism. The self in vertical collectivism is perceived as part of a society based on inequality. In the horizontal collectivism, the self is part of a community where group members are perceived as equal. Vertical individualism, acceptance of autonomous individual and inequality; horizontal individualism consists of an autonomous individual and an emphasis on equality. Some psychologists suggest that social capital related to individualism and collectivism. In light of the literature the aim of this study is to examine whether vertical and horizontal individualism/collectivism predict social capital. Regression analysis was used to determine whether vertical and horizontal individualism/collectivism predict social capital. Overall, the results of this study indicated that Vertical individualism/Collectivism and Horizontal individualism/Collectivism predicted social capital.
Description
Keywords
Sosyal Sermaye, Yatay ve Dikey Bireycilik/Toplulukçuluk, Social Capital, Horizontal and Vertical Individualism/Collectivism
Journal or Series
OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi (OPUS International Journal of Society Researches)
WoS Q Value
Scopus Q Value
Volume
9
Issue
16
