Hypertrophic effects of low-load blood flow restriction training with different repetition schemes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorde Queiros, Victor S.
dc.contributor.authorde Queiros, Victor S.
dc.contributor.authorSchoenfeld, Brad J.
dc.contributor.authorde França, Ingrid Martins
dc.contributor.authorGuilherme Vieira, João
dc.contributor.authorVeiga Sardeli, Amanda
dc.contributor.authorKamış, Okan
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues Neto, Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorde Araújo Tinôco Cabral, Breno Guilherme
dc.contributor.authorMoreira Silva Dantas, Paulo
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-16T13:35:37Z
dc.date.available2024-07-16T13:35:37Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentRektörlük
dc.description.abstractThis systematic review and meta-analysis analyzed the effect of low-load resistance training (LL-RT) with blood flow restriction (BFR) versus high-load resistance training (HL-RT) on muscle hypertrophy focusing on the repetition scheme adopted. Methods. Four databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials that compared the effect of LL-RT with BFR versus HL-RT on muscle hypertrophy. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were pooled in a random effects meta-analysis. Results. The overall analysis did not demonstrate significant differences between conditions (SMD = 0.046; p = 0.14). A similar result was observed when we separately analyzed studies that used sets to momentary muscle failure (SMD = 0.033; p = 0.520), sets of 15 repetitions (SMD = 0.005; p = 0.937) and a fixed repetition scheme composed of 75 repetitions (SMD = 0.088; p = 0.177). The analysis considering body region indicates no difference in lower limb exercise between HL-RT and LL-RT with BFR (SMD = 0.00066; p = 0.795) while upper limb exercise favors HL-RT (SMD = 0.231; p = 0.005). Conclusion. LL-RT with BFR elicits muscle hypertrophy similar to HL-RT regardless of the employed repetition scheme, although there appears to be a small beneficial effect in favor of HL-RT in upper limb exercis
dc.identifier.doi10.7717/peerj.17195
dc.identifier.issn2167-8359
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps:/dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17195
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12451/12141
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPeerJ Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofPeerJ
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectLight Loading
dc.subjectMomentary Muscle Failure
dc.subjectMuscle Mass
dc.subjectStrength Training
dc.subjectVascular Occlusion
dc.titleHypertrophic effects of low-load blood flow restriction training with different repetition schemes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
de queiros-victor s.-2024.pdf
Boyut:
1.09 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Makale Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu