Blood flow restriction training prescription: percentage of lower limb arterial occlusion pressure at fixed values and based on brachial systolic blood pressure

dc.authorid0000-0003-4117-0295
dc.authorid0000-0003-0430-5015
dc.authorid0000-0002-5640-7833
dc.authorid0009-0007-5876-3026
dc.authorid0000-0001-8477-1993
dc.authorid0000-0002-5510-8559
dc.authorid0000-0002-2552-2054
dc.authorid0000-0002-7253-8331
dc.authorid0000-0002-9966-9956
dc.contributor.authorde Queiros, Victor S.
dc.contributor.authorRolnick, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorKamış, Okan
dc.contributor.authorAlves, Julio M.
dc.contributor.authorNeto, Gabriel R.
dc.contributor.authorAmorim, Samuel
dc.contributor.authorGonzaga, Jozilma Medeiros
dc.contributor.authorAniceto, Rodrigo R.
dc.contributor.authorCabral, Breno Guilherme de Araujo Tinoco
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-25T08:20:21Z
dc.date.available2025-07-25T08:20:21Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.description.abstractBlood flow restriction (BFR) exercise is recommended with personalized pressures between 40 and 80% of arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) to ensure safety and efficacy. However, many studies use fixed pressures or personalized pressures based on brachial blood pressure, such as 130% of resting brachial systolic pressure (rbSBP), which may lead to inconsistencies. This study aimed to estimate the percentage of AOP in the thigh when using fixed pressures (e.g., 100, 200, and 300 mmHg) or 130% of SBP.MethodsFifty-one healthy participants (18-40 years) underwent anthropometric measurements, brachial blood pressure assessment, and AOP determination in the thigh in supine, seated, and standing positions using an 18 cm cuff. AOP measurements were randomized and compared to fixed pressures and 130% of SBP.ResultsAOP was higher than 100 mmHg in all positions, with 100 mmHg corresponding to 80.5%, 62%, and 56.9% of AOP in the supine, seated, and standing positions, respectively. Conversely, 200 mmHg exceeded AOP, reaching 160.9%, 124.2%, and 113.7% in the same positions. Compared to SBP, supine AOP was lower than 130% of rbSBP, standing AOP was higher, and seated AOP showed no significant difference (p = 0.595). In the seated and standing positions, 130% of rbSBP corresponded to 92.5% and 84.7% of AOP, respectively.ConclusionA fixed pressure of 100 mmHg may fall within the recommended range for BFR prescription, but findings are specific to AOP assessment with an 18 cm cuff. Personalization remains crucial for accuracy and safety.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11332-025-01456-0
dc.identifier.issn1824-7490 / 1825-1234
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11332-025-01456-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12451/13587
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001503272500001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.institutionauthorKamış, Okan
dc.institutionauthorid0000-0002-5640-7833
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.relation.ispartofSport Sciences for Health
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectVascular Occlusion
dc.subjectLimb Arterial Occlusion
dc.subjectBlood Pressure
dc.subjectExercise Prescription
dc.titleBlood flow restriction training prescription: percentage of lower limb arterial occlusion pressure at fixed values and based on brachial systolic blood pressure
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.17 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: