Bakış açısı almanın özel ytenekli öğrencilerin ahlaki muhakemeleri üzerine etkisi
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2024
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Aksaray Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Bu çalışmanın amacı, sosyobilimsel bir konu olan kök hücre ile ilgili özel yetenekli öğrencilerin ahlaki muhakemeleri üzerine bakış açısı almanın etkisini ortaya koymaktır. Çalışmada nitel nicel araştırmaların birlikte kullanıldığı karma yöntem araştırmaları kullanılmıştır. Karma araştırma desenlerinden yakınsak paralel karma araştırma deseni tercih edilerek nicel ve nitel veriler eş zamanlı toplanıp, analizleri ayrı ayrı yapılarak bulgular bütünleştirilip yorumlanmıştır. Araştırmanın nicel boyutunda deneme öncesi modellerden tek gruplu ön test-son test deneysel desen kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın nitel boyutunda ise durum çalışması kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu 27 kız ve 30 erkek öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Veri toplama aracı olarak kullanılan öntest ve sontestlerde 2 likert tipi soru ve bu sorulara verilen cevapları açıklayıcı nitelikte 2 açık uçlu soru yer almaktadır. Öğrencilerin açık uçlu sorulara verdikleri cevaplar direk alıntı yapılarak araştırmanın nicel bulguları desteklenmiştir. Çalışma fen bilimleri dersinde 4 ders saati (2 hafta) süresinde uygulanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda elde edilen nicel veriler SPSS 15.0 programıyla nitel veriler ise içerik analizi ile analiz edilmiştir. Kök hücrelerin araştırmalarda kullanılmasını destekleme ve etik bulma durumlarının öntest ve sontest sonuçlarına bakıldığında son test lehine anlamlı farklılık olduğu görülmü?tür. Analiz sonuçları araştırmaya katılan öğrencilerin kök hücre çalışmalarını destekleme ve etik/ahlaki bulma durumlarında öntest ve sontest puanları arasında anlamlı bir fark olduğunu, bu farkın sontest puanı lehine olduğunu göstermektedir. Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin kök hücre çalışmalarını destekleyip desteklememe durumlarının ön testson testte değişimi incelendiğinde son testte faydacı muhakemenin daha güçlü bir şekilde ifade edildiği gözlenmiştir. Faydacı muhakeme kapsamında öğrenciler özellikle kök hücrelerin insan sağlığına olumlu etkileri ve bilimsel faydalarına son teste daha çok değinmişlerdir.
The purpose of the current study is to reveal the effect of perspective taking on the moral reasoning of gifted students regarding the subject of stem cells, which is a socioscientific issue. The current study employed the mixed method research, in which qualitative and quantitative research methods are used together. The convergent parallel mixed research design was preferred from among the mixed research designs, and quantitative and qualitative data were collected simultaneously, analyzed separately, and the findings were integrated and interpreted. In the quantitative dimension of the study, a single-group pretest-posttest experimental design, one of the pre-experimental models, was used. In the qualitative dimension of the study, a case study was used. The study group of the study was determined using the criterion sampling method. The study group consists of 27 female and 30 male students. The data collection tool used as pretest and posttest include 2 Likert-type questions and 2 open-ended questions to elaborate on the answers given to the Likert-type questions. The quantitative findings of the study were supported by directly quoting from students? answers given to the open-ended questions. The study was implemented in science classes for 4 class hours each week (2 weeks in total). The quantitative data obtained as a result of the study were analyzed in the SPSS 15.0 program package, and the qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. When the pretest and posttest results regarding the participating students? supporting the use of stem cells in research and finding the use of stem cells ethical were examined, it was seen that there was a significant difference between the pretest and posttest results in favour of the posttest results. When the changes between the pretest and posttest results regarding whether or not gifted students support stem cell research were examined, it was observed that utilitarian reasoning was expressed more strongly in the posttest. Within the context of utilitarian reasoning, students especially mentioned the positive effects and scientific benefits of stem cells on human health more in the posttest.
The purpose of the current study is to reveal the effect of perspective taking on the moral reasoning of gifted students regarding the subject of stem cells, which is a socioscientific issue. The current study employed the mixed method research, in which qualitative and quantitative research methods are used together. The convergent parallel mixed research design was preferred from among the mixed research designs, and quantitative and qualitative data were collected simultaneously, analyzed separately, and the findings were integrated and interpreted. In the quantitative dimension of the study, a single-group pretest-posttest experimental design, one of the pre-experimental models, was used. In the qualitative dimension of the study, a case study was used. The study group of the study was determined using the criterion sampling method. The study group consists of 27 female and 30 male students. The data collection tool used as pretest and posttest include 2 Likert-type questions and 2 open-ended questions to elaborate on the answers given to the Likert-type questions. The quantitative findings of the study were supported by directly quoting from students? answers given to the open-ended questions. The study was implemented in science classes for 4 class hours each week (2 weeks in total). The quantitative data obtained as a result of the study were analyzed in the SPSS 15.0 program package, and the qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. When the pretest and posttest results regarding the participating students? supporting the use of stem cells in research and finding the use of stem cells ethical were examined, it was seen that there was a significant difference between the pretest and posttest results in favour of the posttest results. When the changes between the pretest and posttest results regarding whether or not gifted students support stem cell research were examined, it was observed that utilitarian reasoning was expressed more strongly in the posttest. Within the context of utilitarian reasoning, students especially mentioned the positive effects and scientific benefits of stem cells on human health more in the posttest.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Bakış Açısı Alma, Kök Hücre, Muhakeme, Sosyobilimsel Konular, Özel Yetenekli Öğrenciler, Getting A Perspective, Socioscientific Issues, Gifted Students Regarding, Stem Cells, Reasoning
