Sungur, Derya DenizOnur, Mehmet AliAkbay, EsinTan, GamzeDağlı Cömert, FügenSayın, Taner Cem2022-06-282022-06-282022https:/dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e18.https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12451/9496Objectives: This study evaluated alterations in neuronal conductivity related to calcium silicate cements (CSCs) by investigating compound action potentials (cAPs) in rat sciatic nerves. Materials and methods: Sciatic nerves were placed in a Tyrode bath and cAPs were recorded before, during, and after the application of test materials for 60-minute control, application, and recovery measurements, respectively. Freshly prepared ProRoot MTA, MTA Angelus, Biodentine, Endosequence RRM-Putty, BioAggregate, and RetroMTA were directly applied onto the nerves. Biopac LabPro version 3.7 was used to record and analyze cAPs. The data were statistically analyzed. Results: None of the CSCs totally blocked cAPs. RetroMTA, Biodentine, and MTA Angelus caused no significant alteration in cAPs (p > 0.05). Significantly lower cAPs were observed in recovery measurements for BioAggregate than in the control condition (p < 0.05). ProRoot MTA significantly but transiently reduced cAPs in the application period compared to the control period (p < 0.05). Endosequence RRM-Putty significantly reduced cAPs. Conclusions: Various CSCs may alter cAPs to some extent, but none of the CSCs irreversibly blocked them. The usage of fast-setting CSCs during apexification or regeneration of immature teeth seems safer than slow-setting CSCs due to their more favorable neuronal effects.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessApical ExtrusionBioceramicsCalcium Silicate CementsNeuronal ConductivityNeurotoxicityEffects of calcium silicate cements on neuronal conductivityArticle472--10.5395/rde.2022.47.e18