• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace@Aksaray
  • Fakülteler
  • Tıp Fakültesi
  • Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü
  • Makale Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace@Aksaray
  • Fakülteler
  • Tıp Fakültesi
  • Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü
  • Makale Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Use and detailed metric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review covering two decades

Thumbnail

View/Open

Tam Metin / Full Text (931.1Kb)

Date

2021

Author

Küçükdeveci, Ayşe A.
Elhan, A.H.
Erdoğan, B.D.
Kutlay, Şahin
Gökmen, Derya
Ateş, Can
Yüksel, Selcen
Lundgren-Nilsson, Asa
Escorpizo, Reuben
Stucki, Gerold
Tennant, Alan
Conaghan, Philip G.

Metadata

Show full item record

Abstract

The importance of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical studies has been recognised for many years. The current study aims to describe the RA PROMs used over the past 20 years, and their performance metrics, to underpin appropriate tool selection. The study included a systematic search for PROMs that have been in use over the period 2000–2019, with detailed documentation of their psychometric properties, and a user-friendly presentation of the extensive evidence base. 125 PROMs were identified with psychometric evidence available. The domains of pain, fatigue, emotional functions, mobility, physical functioning and work dominated, with self-efficacy and coping as personal factors. Domains such as stiffness and sleep were poorly served. The most frequently used PROMs included the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ), the Short Form 36 (SF-36), the EuroQoL and the Modified HAQ which, between them, appeared in more than 3500 papers. Strong psychometric evidence was found for the HAQ, and the SF-36 Physical Functioning and Vitality (fatigue) domains. Otherwise, all domains except stiffness, sleep, education and health utility, had at least one PROM with moderate level of psychometric evidence. There is a broad range of PROMs for measuring RA outcomes, but the quality of psychometric evidence varies widely.

Source

RMD Open

Volume

7

Issue

2

URI

https:/dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001707
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12451/8845

Collections

  • Makale Koleksiyonu [57]
  • PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [896]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [3464]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [3380]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Instruction | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@Aksaray

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherCategoryLanguageAccess TypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherCategoryLanguageAccess Type

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Google Analytics Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Policy || Instruction || Guide || Library || Aksaray University || OAI-PMH ||

Aksaray Üniversitesi Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı, Aksaray, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contactkutuphane@aksaray.edu.tr

Creative Commons License
DSpace@Aksaray by Aksaray University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Aksaray:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.